t3

Michael Doe specializes in Korean and Japanese affairs as the senior research fellow for Northeast Asia.

Areas of Expertise

  • Asia
  • Arms Control
  • Missile Defense

BIO (A global network of competent specialists)

lipsum as it is sometimes known, is dummy text used in laying out print, graphic or web designs. The passage is attributed to an unknown typesetter in the 15th century who is thought to have scrambled parts of Cicero’s De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum for use in a type specimen book.

lipsum as it is sometimes known, is dummy text used in laying out print, graphic or web designs. The passage is attributed to an unknown typesetter in the 15th century who is thought to have scrambled parts of Cicero’s De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum for use in a type specimen book.

lipsum as it is sometimes known, is dummy text used in laying out print, graphic or web designs. The passage is attributed to an unknown typesetter in the 15th century who is thought to have scrambled parts of Cicero’s De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum for use in a type specimen book.lipsum as it is sometimes known, is dummy text used in laying out print, graphic or web designs. The passage is attributed to an unknown typesetter in the 15th century who is thought to have scrambled parts of Cicero’s De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum for use in a type specimen book.

PUBLICATION

A British Legal Framework for Religious Hate and the Challenges of Defining Anti-Muslim Hatred

The government is considering a working definition on anti-Muslim hatred. This process began in Feb- ruary 2025 with the creation of a Working Group on Anti-Muslim Hatred/Islamophobia Definition which submitted advice to the Deputy Prime Minister and Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government in October 2025. However, the best response to anti-Muslim hate is an even-handed re-assertion of the existing British legal framework for religious hate, rather than singling out one community and introducing a new definition or legislation that could be counterproductive and divisive. That framework provides equal religious rights for all and is a positive offer...

Read more

PUBLICATION

Islamist Antisemitism: A Neglected Hate

The Independent Review of Prevent by Sir William Shawcross observes that many individuals of radicalisation concern appear to harbour antisemitic beliefs, in some cases expressing the intent to assault and kill members of the Jewish community. The Review consequently recommends that Prevent begin to address the anti-Jewish component of both Islamist and Extreme Right-Wing ideology. British institutions tasked with countering extremism should develop a far better understanding of Islamist antisemitism and its role in radicalisation to violence, better enabling practitioners and the policy community to tackle this particularly pernicious and powerful component of extremism. This report provides a resource to assist in the development of such an understanding, combining historical scholarship with statistical analysis and a summary of opinion from a diverse group of experts.

Read more

COMMENTARY

CEG response to Government’s Prevent Review ‘Progress Update’

One year on progress report - public support for Hamas shows more work needs to be done Sir William Shawcross’ concerns about the implementation of his Prevent review should prompt the Government to action. In the press yesterday, Sir William criticised the Government’s ‘One year on progress report’, arguing that there are key areas among his 34 recommendations that have not been adequately addressed. In his original review, published last February, Sir William criticised Prevent for overlooking an in-depth investigation into the domestic Hamas support network (IRP, p.25), despite the terrorist group being proscribed in full in late 2019. Troublingly, since the 7...

Read more

COMMENTARY

The Home Secretary Looks Determined to Shake Up Prevent

When the Independent Review of Prevent by Sir William Shawcross was published earlier this year, many in the counter-terrorism field applauded what Shawcross had said. If implemented, the reforms he proposed would be the biggest overhaul of Britain’s national counter-radicalisation programme in a decade. Yet despite the Government saying that it was committed to implementing all 34 of the Prevent review’s recommendations, some supporters I spoke to were quietly doubtful. They seemed convinced that the Prevent review and its recommendations would soon fall into obscurity and that nothing would really change. The release of the new Prevent Duty Guidance earlier...

Read more